Language | Journey to Diversity Workplaces

Understanding the Alphabet Soup of Inclusive Language Part II

This blog post is the second instalment of a series. The first post in this series introduced the idea of inclusive language and provided a beginner’s guideline on its use when addressing racialized employees. This second instalment focuses on disability, gender, and sexuality.

Making use of inclusive language is a significant way in which you can establish your organisation’s commitment to diversity, and communicate to clients and employees that your workplace is a welcoming environment that respects others’ identities. As you begin to use inclusive language more regularly, you may find yourself adopting terms and phrases that are new to you, some of which may challenge your preconceived notions of the structure of your society. But a commitment to diversity and allyship requires the flexibility of an open mind and a willingness to learn.

When it comes to matters of disability, one phrase you may or may not have encountered is person-first language. Person-first language is based on the view that people are complex and cannot be pared down to any single aspect of their identities (Ferguson & Bellamy, 2022). In practice, person-first language describes “a person with a disability” rather than “a disabled person.” While the intention behind person-first language comes from a place of respect, it is actually a point of contention within the disability community. Many of its members prefer to use identity-first language, and opt to self-describe as “a disabled person.”

To some, the aim of person-first language to centre upon personhood doesn’t achieve its goal of making disabled people feel more included. Instead, it makes it seem as if an individual’s disability is something negative, something they should want to be separated from, rather than another characteristic like hair colour, gender, or religion (Liebowitz, 2015). In reality, a person’s disability is integral to the way they live their life; it is often a meaningful component of their identity (Brown, n.d.). Consequently, many disabled people prefer identity-first language because it comes from a place of disability pride and more accurately underscores the reality of being disabled. Identity-first language is preferred by many disability activists, especially within the Deaf and autistic communities (National Center on Disability and Journalism [NCDJ], 2021).

It’s important to recognize that there is no singular approach when it comes to the appropriate use of identity-first vs. person-first language. After all, some within the disability community, such as those with intellectual disabilities, prefer person-first language (Liebowitz, 2015). At the end of the day, it’s considered best practice to use the terminology that those with disabilities would prefer, not what allies or what parent and physician groups have to say. When addressing disabled employees and clients, consider asking them what language they’re most comfortable with. When conferring with individuals is not an option, it would be best to research which terms tend to be preferred by that subcommunity in particular. Note that suggestions regarding the use of person-first language are not as straightforward as some diversity guidebooks may have you believe. Simply being thoughtful with the terminology you use is an important component of applying inclusive language effectively; in most cases, it is not a simple checklist of dos and don’ts.

Meanwhile, the use of queer-inclusive language can present its own set of complexities. There are a number of different subgroups within the queer community. Some, like the asexual or intersex communities, receive little attention in the media, with the result that public understanding of those communities is limited. It’s best to turn to queer-run organizations for guidelines on what language to use when referring to different members of the LGBTQ+ community. Organizations like Pride at Work Canada (PaWC) and The 519—Toronto’s main queer community centre and charity—both provide resources on the definitions and usage of LGBTQ+ terminology (and, in the case of PaWC, offer a course designed specifically for employers on queer history and phrases, which is linked below).

Although it isn’t feasible to discuss the nuances of every queer identity in existence in one blog post, J2DW can offer a few key pointers. When addressing the community as a whole, it is widely accepted to use the phrases “queer” and “LGBTQ+.” Most queer people use these phrases interchangeably when speaking about their community. If you are addressing one employee, it is usually acceptable to refer to their particular identity if they have shared it with you. However, if an employee self-identifies as a member of the LGBTQ+ community but has not shared more specifics about their identity, it is inappropriate to request that they go into more detail. Gender identity and sexual orientation are deeply personal matters, and there are a number of reasons behind why an employee may have chosen not to share the specifics of their identity at their workplace. If you aren’t sure how to address an LGBTQ+ individual, the umbrella term “queer” is generally a safe bet, and that individual will let you know if they’d prefer to be addressed in some other way.

Respecting people’s gender identities is a crucial component of creating a queer-inclusive workplace, and the language you use should reflect that. Do not make assumptions about the gender identity of your employees and clients, and always refer to them by the correct name and pronouns regardless of what their official ID might indicate (Vulpe, 2018). There’s also a chance that you may find yourself referring to someone who uses they/them pronouns. Using singular they/them pronouns might be confusing at first, but you’ve probably been using them already without even realizing it. Take the case, for example, of having found an abandoned wallet in public. “Someone lost their wallet,” you might think. “I should check to see if there’s any ID inside and notify the owner so they can pick it up.” It’s also best to use gender-neutral pronouns when talking about individuals in a hypothetical or general sense; doing so is in fact more natural than the clunky he/she, and it is inclusive of everyone regardless of their gender identity (Ferguson & Bellamy, 2022).

Of course, groups of people sometimes disagree over preferred terminology. Members of a community, such as the LGBTQ+ community, are not a monolith. Queer people may unite over a broader shared experience, but they are still individuals with diverse opinions and their own personal life events that have shaped the way they navigate and present themselves to the world. If you are engaging with one specific employee or group of employees who happen to prefer a different term of address than what is commonly preferred by those who share their identity, always ensure you meet those individuals’ wishes. A workplace cannot be included unless the individual needs of the people within that workplace are met.

As you learn more about adopting inclusive language into your vocabulary, understand that you are likely to make mistakes and that these are a natural part of the learning process. In these instances, the best you can do is apologize to the people you might have unintentionally hurt and try to ensure that your use of terminology is amended in the future. Though you may become frustrated, embarrassed, or ashamed when you make mistakes, try to view these occurrences as an opportunity for growth. Intent will take you a long way on the road to promoting diversity, and your concern over being respectful towards those who might be different from you will help you overcome some hurdles as you adjust to using new terminology.

Sources

Brown, L. (n.d.). Identity-First Language. Autistic Self Advocacy Network. Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://autisticadvocacy.org/about-asan/identity-first-language/

Disability Language Style Guide. National Center on Disability and Journalism. (2021, August). Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://ncdj.org/style-guide/

Ferguson, J., & Bellamy, R. (2022, May 20). How to get better at using inclusive language in the workplace. Fast Company. Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://www.fastcompany.com/90753901/how-to-get-better-at-using-inclusive-language-in-the-workplace

LGBTQ2S Glossary of Terms. The 519. (2020, February). Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://www.the519.org/education-training/glossary

LGBTQ2+ 101: History, terms and phrases. Pride At Work Canada. (n.d.). Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://education.prideatwork.ca/LGBT101.html

Liebowitz, C. (2015, March 12). I am Disabled: On Identity-First Versus People-First Language. The Body Is Not An Apology. Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://thebodyisnotanapology.com/magazine/i-am-disabled-on-identity-first-versus-people-first-language/

Vulpe, J. H. (2018, May 7). Listen Before You Speak: Discussing Trans and Gender-Diverse People in the Media. The 519. Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://www.the519.org/news/media-reference-guide-01-18

This article was written by summer student Cossette Penner-Olivera and edited by summer student Bayden Summers. This article was funded by the Government of Canada.

Understanding the Alphabet Soup of Inclusive Language Part I

Inclusive language is a term used to characterize a choice of words that seeks to include people from a diverse array of backgrounds, in order to encompass as many groups of people as possible. The terminology of inclusive language is such that it is all-embracing and respectful of everyone—particularly those belonging to marginalized groups. Its use has been steadily growing in professional spaces including workplaces, academic institutions, and in the media. At first, growing accustomed to the everyday use of inclusive language may be challenging. It can be overwhelming and even intimidating to embrace a new terminology that challenges the way one is accustomed to speaking, and it may bring unconscious biases to light. But through training, a little practice, and by keeping an open mind, incorporating inclusive language into your vocabulary will soon become second nature.

A number of organizations offer extended training and courses on the understanding and use of inclusive terminology specifically within the workplace. In this blog post, Journey to Diversity Workplaces will offer guidelines and resources for how you as an employer can start to examine the language you use in order to create a more accommodating workplace. This week, we focus on using Black- and Indigenous-inclusive language, but in a follow-up blog post we’ll discuss inclusive language as it relates to disability as well as gender and sexuality. Remember that this article is only intended as an introduction, and does not claim to serve as the be-all and end-all of what your inclusive language training should look like in terms of discussion on matters that concern race and equality.

As you go forward, bear in mind that there may be conflicting ideas over the most respectful term to refer to a group of people. As an employer, you may be inclined to turn to government resources in order to ensure that you’re using the appropriate terminology when addressing your employees, and when making reference to BIPOC, queer, and disabled communities in general. But it’s always best to listen to the preferences of the members of the minority groups that the language is describing and to treat those preferences as having authority over what official organizations might suggest. They are the ones most directly affected by the language you use.

Each topic addressed in this blog article requires a high degree of nuance, and most terminology used to refer to underrepresented groups carries a high degree of weight. Though we cannot provide an in-depth exploration of those nuances in one short blog post, we can run through some of the more common examples of inclusive language you will likely find useful in the workplace.

When referring to racial minorities as a whole, the term most commonly used in racial equality circles is BIPOC, an umbrella term that stands for “Black and Indigenous People Of Colour.” It is an expansion of the previously-used People Of Colour (POC), with the first two letters added to give more visibility to Black and Indigenous communities. Nowadays, the acronym BIPOC is preferred over POC because it emphasizes the unique types of racism that these groups experience, in particular the deep-rooted and lasting effects of slavery, colonization, and genocide (Olsen, 2022).

Capitalizing the letter B in Black is considered respectful and more inclusive when referring to Black people or to Black coworkers. In the United States, the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) made an official statement that they would be capitalizing the B in Black in all their communications going forward as of 2020, and recommends other organizations adopt the same practice out of respect for the Black diaspora (National Association of Black Journalists [NABJ], 2020). The capitalized Black is also preferred over the phrase African Americans because, quite simply, not all Black people are American, nor does their ancestry necessarily trace back to the African continent (Olsen, 2022).

Opinions are a little more divided over the capitalization of the letter W when referring to white people. Some Black-run organizations, including the NABJ, choose to capitalize the W in white as part of a blanket procedure for describing all racial groups. However, it’s also important to consider the race-driven context, one that white people do not share, in which Black is capitalized as a means of upholding a shared community and history, partially in response to white supremacy. There’s no easy answer here, so it may be worthwhile to invite a group discussion over the capitalization of W in white at your workplace, provided that BIPOC employees are given ample opportunity to voice their opinions in such discussions. Regardless of your company’s decision regarding the term white, however, continue to capitalize the B in Black unless your Black employees and clients express the wish to be referred to in another way.

Choosing the right terminology for Indigenous communities is sometimes challenging because there are so many different nations and communities that originate from Canada, each with its own needs and preferences. As a rule of thumb, it’s always best to refer to someone’s particular nation by name when talking to an individual or addressing a specific issue (Baker et al., 2021), but “Indigenous peoples” is generally considered an acceptable term when talking more broadly about Indigenous-related topics. Employers should turn to Indigenous-run organizations for more detailed guidelines regarding using inclusive terminology.

Indigenous Corporate Training Inc. (ICT) offers one such resource on their website, listing the circumstances under which it’s appropriate to use terms that have been used to describe Indigenous peoples. Aboriginal, for example, is a term that includes all First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples, and may sometimes be used interchangeably with the term Indigenous peoples. However, some First Nations prefer not to be called Aboriginal (Indigenous Corporate Training [ICT], 2016). They also advise that while the descriptor “First Nations” covers many communities within Canada, it does not include Inuit and Métis Peoples—and many of those communities still prefer the term Indigenous, as they have publicly expressed in Ontario and elsewhere (ICT, 2016). For this reason, “Indigenous” is often preferred by many nations in Canada because of its inclusiveness.

Having said all that, it’s vital that you abide by the wishes of your Indigenous employees and clients by prioritizing the language they prefer. Language is highly personal, and there is a great diversity of thought within each individual nation (Baker et al., 2021). Though based in the United States, where some nations refer to themselves differently than those within Canada, the organization Native Governance Center explains that you should never assume all Indigenous peoples will use the same terminology. The same principle applies here in Canada.

Listening to the voices of the people you work for and work with is the most effective way in which you can create a more inclusive workplace. In practice, equality demands more than just using the right terminology. Concern for diversity needs to be reflected in your actions as an individual employer and as a company, but using inclusive language is a key starting point from which you can begin discussing how you and your company can continuously strive to do better.

Sources

Baker, T., Little Elk, W., Pollard, B., & Yellow Bird, M. (2021, October 1). How to Talk About Native Nations: A Guide. Native Governance Center. Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://nativegov.org/news/how-to-talk-about-native-nations-a-guide/

Indigenous Peoples terminology guidelines for usage. Indigenous Corporate Training Inc. (2016, July 20). Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://www.ictinc.ca/blog/indigenous-peoples-terminology-guidelines-for-usage

NABJ Statement on Capitalizing Black and Other Racial Identifiers. National Association of Black Journalists. (2020, June 11). Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://nabjonline.org/blog/nabj-statement-on-capitalizing-black-and-other-racial-identifiers/

Olsen, B. (2022). What Does the Term BIPOC Mean and Why Is It Important? LGBTQ and ALL. Retrieved August 13, 2022, from https://www.lgbtqandall.com/what-does-the-term-bipoc-mean-and-why-is-it-important/

This article was written by summer student Cossette Penner-Olivera and edited by summer student Ilesha Prabhudesai. This article was funded by the Government of Canada.